To Do For All That Which No One Can Do For Oneself
Header

On Thursday, March 13, 2025 (12:15pm) the AFGE General Committee Spokesperson released a email to Union officials with a summary of the Morning Meeting with Acting Commissioner Dudek and the the leadership of the three (3) SSA Unions.

This is a summary of the discussions on RTO and Telework:

At the top of the meeting, I raised the recent telework terminations at OCIO, and stated that the terminations will induce attrition that will threaten systems stability and knowledge transfer of SSA’s aging and fragile systems. I reiterated that telework terminations for other SSA components, especially the frontlines (FO, TSC, WSU, OHO, OAO, OQR, etc.), would be inconsistent with the Administration’s exemptions from the hiring freeze EO, deferred resignations, and probationary terminations because telework elimination would cause catastrophic attrition at a time when we are already at the lowest staffing levels in 50 years serving more Americans than ever, and that such attrition would lead to service collapse.

In response, the Acting Commissioner stated that he would honor union contracts, and stated that the OCIO telework cuts are only temporary because there are time-limited projects that he believed were best served through in-person collaboration. I stated that the problem is that OCIO employees received an HRIC telling them that their telework was terminated, and that their supervisors served them with termination notices, which suggests that the cuts were not temporary. I also stated that, agencywide, management did not solicit their employees for new telework agreements as required by the contract every February and August, which does not create the appearance that the Agency is honoring the contract. Mr. Dudek reiterated that he would honor the contracts and that there he has no plan or intention to permanently eliminate telework. I stated that actions must be taken to correct the record. I will be following up with OLMER on this matter.

Mr. Dudek also reiterated his statement that he would adhere to the contracts in response to questions from the AALJ. This is an apparent change in position from the prior emails employees have received since January, and we will do everything to ensure that the Agency follows through.

On Thursday, March 13, 2025 (3:55pm) the Agency released the following notice to AFGE General committee Spokesperson:

Dear Mr. Couture,
This is informational notice that in accordance with Article 41, Section 5.C. of the 2019 SSA/AFGE National Agreement, the Social Security Administration is suspending telework effective March 16, 2025, for all AFGE bargaining unit employees with the exception of employees in the Office of Hearings Operations, and the Office of Financial Policy and Program Integrity. All effected AFGE employees must return to work in-person at their respective duty stations on a full-time basis unless excused due to a disability, qualifying medical condition, or other compelling reason certified by the agency head and the employee’s supervisor.

Eddie Taylor
Associate Commissioner
Office of Labor-Management and Employe Relations

On Thursday, March 13, 2025 (4:01 pm) the Agency released the following notice to SSA Bargaining Unit

From: ^Human Resources Internal Communications <Human.Resources.Internal.Communications@ssa.gov>
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2025 4:01 PM
Subject: Bargaining Unit Employees – Return to In-Person Work

A Message to All Employees

Subject:  Bargaining Unit Employees – Return to In-Person Work

On Monday, January 20, 2025, President Trump issued a Presidential Memorandum (PM) requiring all employees to return to work in-person full time.  This message serves as your official notice that your telework agreement will be suspended effective March 16, 2025, with all employees expected to return to work in-person full time on March 17, 2025

*AFGE’s position that the Agency is in violation of the AFGE/SSA Negotiated Agreement.

*AFGE is in consultation with our Legal team for guidance on an effective response/litigation plan.

*Employees should return to work as directed.

*AFGE will continue to update as information becomes available.

*We urge all employees including friends and family to contact the legislative representative with your concerns.

Trump 2.0 EO Breakdown

Schedule Political/Career (PC) Executive Order

Soundbites:

  1. “This action will transform the professional civil service into an army of political appointees loyal to Trump, not their mission.”
  2. “It dismantles the merit-based civil service, jeopardizing professionalism and impartiality.”

Key Details:

  • Creates a hiring authority in the excepted service (Schedule PC) for policy-influencing decisions.
  • Could make hundreds of thousands of non-partisan roles into at-will positions.
  • Purports to remove due process protections and collective bargaining rights.

Legal Analysis:
Nothing in this Executive Order, as written, should abrogate existing collective bargaining agreements (CBAs), which remain in full force and effect. If agencies attempt to violate CBAs, unions should notify their Districts, Councils, and AFGE National. Members are encouraged to comply and grieve to ensure rights are upheld.

President Kelley:
“This order is a blatant attempt to corrupt the federal government by removing protections for workers, making them answerable only to one man.”

Return to Worksite Directive

Soundbites:

  1. “Telework isn’t new—over half of federal employees never worked remotely, even during the pandemic.”
  2. “Smart telework enhances productivity, recruitment, and retention. Rolling it back disrupts operations and progress.”

Key Details:

  • Directive allows agencies discretion in implementation, with no specific timeline.
  • Hybrid schedules negotiated in contracts remain binding.

Legal Analysis:
This directive does not, as written, violate collective bargaining agreements. Hybrid telework schedules detailed in CBAs remain legally binding. Should agencies implement policies contrary to CBAs, unions must notify their Districts, Councils, and AFGE National, comply, and grieve.

President Kelley:
“This directive undoes decades of workplace progress. Rather than regressing, we urge the administration to focus on improving government programs for the public.”

Federal Hiring Freeze Memorandum

Soundbites:

  1. “The federal workforce hasn’t grown since the 1970s, while the U.S. population has skyrocketed.”
  2. “Freezing hiring worsens workforce shortages and skills gaps, undermining vital services.”

Key Details:

  • Freezes civilian hiring for up to 90 days, with exceptions for national security and public safety roles.
  • Prohibits outsourcing to circumvent the freeze.

Legal Analysis:
The hiring freeze does not, on its face, abrogate CBAs. However, agencies’ implementation must align with negotiated agreements. If violations occur, unions should escalate to their Districts, Councils, and AFGE National, ensuring compliance and filing grievances as necessary.

President Kelley:
“This isn’t about efficiency—it’s about chaos and targeting patriotic Americans. These actions only harm the services the public relies on.”

Targeting DEI Programs

Soundbites:

  1. “Merit-based systems require fairness for all, ensuring opportunity regardless of background.”
  2. “Federal agencies have the lowest gender and racial pay gaps because hiring decisions are based on ability, not bias.”

Key Details:

  • Ends all DEI initiatives and reviews federal employment practices for compliance with the EO.
  • Risks undermining workplace equity and military readiness, as per defense leaders.

Legal Analysis:
The EO’s directive to review employment practices must comply with existing CBAs. If agencies attempt to implement changes that conflict with CBAs, unions should notify their Districts, Councils, and AFGE National, comply, and grieve to uphold the negotiated terms.

President Kelley:
“DEI programs promote fairness and build a workforce that mirrors America’s diversity. Their elimination jeopardizes progress and inclusivity.”

Lawsuit Against DOGE

Soundbites:

  1. “Fairness, accountability, and transparency—these are at the heart of our lawsuit.”
  2. “Federal employees aren’t the problem; they are the solution. Excluding them threatens good governance.”

Key Details:

  • DOGE’s composition excludes federal employees’ voices, violating the Federal Advisory Committee Act.
  • AFGE and partners demand fair representation and transparency in government decision-making.

Legal Analysis:
While this lawsuit focuses on transparency and accountability, it is also critical for agencies to honor CBAs. If DOGE-led initiatives infringe on CBA terms, unions should escalate issues to their Districts, Councils, and AFGE National, comply, and grieve.

President Kelley:
“This fight is about fairness and integrity. Federal employees’ voices are crucial to decisions affecting their work and public service.”

Reforming Federal Hiring

Soundbites:

  1. “Replacing objective criteria with vague ideals is a path to cronyism. Federal jobs should go to the most qualified, not the most connected.”
  2. “Merit-based hiring ensures federal employees serve the public, not political interests.”

Key Details:

  • Proposes subjective hiring criteria tied to “American ideals” and “efficiency,” undermining the current merit-based system.

Legal Analysis:
This EO, as written, does not eliminate protections afforded under CBAs. Should agencies adopt hiring practices inconsistent with CBAs, unions must escalate issues to their Districts, Councils, and AFGE National, comply, and grieve to protect merit-based hiring systems.

President Kelley:
“The federal government already hires and promotes exclusively on the basis of merit. The results are clear: a diverse federal workforce that looks like the nation it serves, with the lowest gender and racial pay gaps in the country. We should all be proud of that.”

Members please review the side-by-side comparison of old vs new contract language proposed for a MEMBERS ONLY VOTE Wednesday, October 11, 2023, 6pm CST via ZOOM invite below.

Topic: AFGE MEMBERSHIP MEETING AND RATIFICATION VOTE
Time: Oct 11, 2023 06:00 PM Central Time (US and Canada)

Join Zoom Meeting Link
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/84503649449?pwd=cWlENC9HTWNDcVcxS2xTVUpNalE5QT09

Meeting ID: 845 0364 9449
Passcode: 101123

Dial by your location

  • +1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago)

Meeting ID: 845 0364 9449
Passcode: 101123

Find your local number: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/kcriR1sIym

AFGE General Committee has successfully negotiated updates to the 2019 Collective Bargaining Agreement (Contract).

The members will have the opportunity to review and vote on the approval of the updates.

Review the Ratification Articles: https://www.afge1395.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Ratification-articles-2023.pdf

Here are the Highlights of Changes to the Contract:

Below is a summary of gains made:

Article 3 – Employee Rights:

  • New definition of workplace bullying to better protect employees.
  • When a manager holds a meeting and is aware that the meeting may result in disciplinary action, the manager will inform the employee of the subject matter of the meeting and of their right to have a union representative present.
  • The Union normally will be given at least 2 workdays’ notice of formal discussions.
  • Employees will be entitled to and informed of their right to union representation when undergoing a fitness for duty exam.
  • New employees will be introduced to the staff within the first week of their report-for-duty date.
  • The Agency will provide duty time for employees to read emails such as Agency transmittals, Human Resource Internal Communications, and PolicyNet transmittal updates.

Article 16 – Training and Career Development:

  • The Agency is responsible for ensuring all employees are provided time to attend and complete assigned training.
  • The Agency will conduct follow-up surveys normally six (6) months after formal training classes, and results (respondent scores, comments, etc.) will be shared with the Union within 60 days after the administration of the survey.
  • Future interactive training models will be a subject for UMCC processes under Article 29.
  • More open solicitation and training of bargaining unit instructors for training classes. Potential “train the trainer” courses for specific components or positions can be addressed under Article 29 UMCC process.
  • Agency acknowledges that duty time is appropriate for employees to complete and participate in an IDP.
  • The Agency will advise employees of their right to request reasonable accommodation with respect to training.
  • Removal of IVT broadcasts for training.
  • Management will make every reasonable effort to ensure that the mentoring process is completed without interruption (e.g., scheduling sufficient blocks of time to allow for a mentor and an employee to meet to discuss casework and other work items, sufficient time for a mentor to review an employee’s work).
  • Continuing legal education and law license fee reimbursement.
  • Future career development programs are a subject for agencywide or component level UMCC meetings under Article 29.

Article 20 – Child Care and Elder Care:

  • Improvements to the lactation program section, including spaces must be shielded from view by video recording devices, and management will provide space with a lockable door and avoid using space that contains equipment like copiers, printers, etc. Space will be cleaned daily.
  • For each Agency facility lacking a dedicated refrigerator for storing expressed milk, upon request, the Agency will provide one “mini-fridge,” per site, for dedicated storage of expressed milk.
  • The Agency will establish an emergency backup care program for dependent minors and/or adult dependent or disabled family members, subject to procurement procedures and available funds, to begin on or after October 1, 2024.

Article 23 – Disciplinary and Adverse Action:

  • Weingarten investigations will be initiated timely after the alleged offense was committed, made known to the appropriate Agency official, or referred (e.g. at the conclusion of other formal investigations by the Office of the Inspector General (OIG), Office of Special Counsel (OSC), and the Agency anti-harassment program), to the appropriate Agency official.

This closes a loophole in the existing timeliness language regarding initiation of discipline.

  • Management will provide copies of notes taken during Weingarten investigations to the employee/representative as soon as possible after a Weingarten meeting.

Article 27 – Details:

  • Temporary Compassionate Assignments (TCAs) – Employees may request an assignment to another SSA facility in a different geographic location, or, a temporary residence other than the employee’s Article 41 approved Alternate Duty Station (ADS) in a different geographic location, or their current Article 41 ADS for up to 60 days based on a temporary personal situation (e.g., illness of parent, etc.) outside of the employee’s control. “Different geographic location” is defined as being outside the two-hour commuting area.
  • New virtual details section to create additional detail opportunities within and between components.

Article 29 – Union-Management Cooperation Councils (UMCCs):

New partnership/forum process to replace the Union-Management Meeting at the agency and component-council levels. Meetings will be co-chaired and jointly run by union and agency leaders, rather than through a labor relations intermediary. Jointly-determined agenda items for pre-decisional involvement, with sharing of information, and understandings reduced to writing. Pre-implementation bargaining if issues remain after PDI. A sidebar including already agreed-upon topics like child care subsidy, future of interactive training, mentoring training, anti-bullying training, artificial intelligence, and career development programs. Additional items affecting employees can be added to agendas once meetings can be scheduled after ratification.

General:

  • 2019 National Agreement extended until October 25, 2029.
  • Extension of the January 23, 2023 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) regarding eligibility of telework (e.g., probationary employees, trainees, employees with minor discipline, etc. can telework) until October 25, 2029.

NEWS UPDATES

August 29th, 2023 | Posted by admin in CHALLENGER | Contract - (0 Comments)

Stay Connected, Stay Informed!

Click on the Link to view August 2023 AFGE Local 1395 Challenger!

http://Local 1395 Challenger – Aug 2023https://online.flipbuilder.com/yjbz/whik/

Contract UPDATE

October 7th, 2019 | Posted by admin in Contract | Did you know? - (0 Comments)

 AFGE & SSA  reach new

Collective Bargaining Agreement 

After more than a year of tense negotiations, the Social Security Administration and the American Federation of Government Employees have finally reached an agreement on a new, six-year contract.

The new collective bargaining agreement, which SSA management and AFGE representatives signed late last week, settles months of disagreements between the two parties and offers both some stability days before the injunction on the president’s May 2018 executive orders was lifted.

 

See Full Article in Federal News  AFGE/SSA Contract

Contract UPDATE!

August 19th, 2019 | Posted by admin in Contract | KNOW YOUR CONTRACT - (0 Comments)

SSA Members Voted

NOT

to Ratify the

Proposed Contract

 

Stay Tuned for More Updates! 

CONTRACT UPDATE- DECEMBER 26, 2018

BACKGROUND

Over the last few months, AFGE has been fighting an uphill battle with the Administration and the Agency. In July, the Agency unilaterally implemented the terms of three Executive Orders designed to shut down the Union and eliminate important workplace protections for all employees. The Agency unilaterally changed our ground rules for contract bargaining, intended to undermine our ability to negotiate on level ground by reducing bargaining sessions and refusing to cover certain negotiation costs. The Union lost significant preparation time and had to enter negotiations with a smaller team. Further, SSA’s initial contract proposals mirrored the terms of the Executive Orders, which made its anti-employee and anti-union position clear.

AFGE sued the Administration over the Executive Orders and won. On August 25, 2018, a U.S. district court judge invalidated much of the Executive Orders as unlawful. SSA rescinded the Executive Order terms it had already implemented and reverted back to the negotiate ground rules, though damage was done. The Union returned to the bargaining table demanding that SSA revise its contract proposals to reflect the court decision. When SSA finally provided revised proposals in September 2018, SSA maintained its most egregious proposals to dramatically slash representational time, eliminate space for representational work, and eliminate employee rights to challenge unfair appraisals, unfair award decisions, and unfair removals through the grievance and arbitration procedure. In response, the Union filed a grievance over the Agency’s continued adherence to invalidated provisions of the Executive Orders. In addition, the Agency proposed to strip negotiated telework rights and leave decisions on telework policy entirely to the discretion of management. Despite the severe anti-employee and anti-union environment, the Union nonetheless went to the bargaining table to secure employee rights and protections.

In October and November, the Union and the Agency agreed on Articles 3 (Employee Rights), 16 (Training), and 31 (Leave). Importantly, the Union saved the language in Article 3, Section 2.A which requires management to treat employees fairly and equitably in all aspects of personnel management, and without regard to protected class status. As the parties began to focus on Article 9 in November, the Agency abruptly changed its behavior with the Union. Despite the progress that the parties had made in October and November, the Agency alleged that the Union was not bargaining fast enough. The Union retorted that the ground rules give the parties until March 1, 2019 to bargain, and that the parties had just reached agreement on three articles, in addition to numerous articles in prior months. Regardless, the Agency showed no interest in the Union’s proposals the rest of the week, and demanded the mediator release the parties to the Federal Service Impasses Panel (FSIP). The Union opposed this request based on the ground rules and the Agency’s bargaining behavior.

(more…)

DID YOU KNOW? 

Here is some contract guidance for Sick Leave Restrictions. The most unknown  fact is that it is the gift that keeps on giving for two (2) years.

 

A LEAVE PATTERN is the ONLY reason you should be on SICK Leave restriction,  example,  calling in every Monday for three months straight.

 

Article 31, section 4.B.

Where the Agency has reason to believe that an employee is abusing the use of sick leave, the Agency may inquire further into the matter. If there is evidence that an employee’s leave pattern may indicate that an abuse of sick leave existsthe employee shall first be advised by an interview, which shall be recorded in the SF-7B file, of the reasons a medical certificate may be required for each subsequent absence or sick leave.  The use of sick leave for scheduled medical appointments caused by recurring and previously documented medical conditions will not be considered a leave pattern that indicates an abuse of sick leave.

If the employee’s leave pattern continues, the employee will be advised in writing as to whether an acceptable medical certificate may be required for each subsequent absence for which sick leave is requested.

The sick leave usage of all employees under sick leave restriction will be reviewed at least every four (4) months and a written decision to continue or lift the restrictions made.  If the review shows significant improvement, the supervisor will lift the restriction. 

 

Advance SICK leave criteria.

If you are on restriction “NO advance sick leave”

Article 31, Section 4.D.

Sick leave will be advanced when the following required conditions have been satisfied:

 

1.   The employee is serving under a career or career-conditional appointment.

 

2.   The employee has a minimum of 1 year’s Federal civilian service.

 

3.   All available accumulated sick leave to his/her credit has been exhausted.

4.   There is no expectation that the employee is contemplating separation by retirement or resignation.

5.   A medical certificate substantiates that a serious illness or injury exists, and that the employee will be capable of subsequently returning to work and fulfilling the full scope of his/her job.

6.   There is no expectation that the employee will not remain employed after his/her return to duty long enough to repay the advance of sick leave.

7.   The employee does not have a current letter of warning or disciplinary action properly proposed or effected for abuse of sick leave.

 

Restrictions on Advance Annual are for TWO (2) years. If you are on restriction no advance annual even if you are off restriction

Article 31, Section 2C. 

1.  Advanced annual leave is leave time requested on an SSA-71 or equivalent, approved by the delegated authority and taken but not yet earned by the employee.

2.  An employee may be advanced the lesser of 80 hours or the amount of annual leave an employee would accrue during the remainder of the leave year (i.e., maximum of 80 hours in the leave year). 

This provision does not apply to employees who are currently on a leave restriction or who have been disciplined for leave related offenses in the past two years.

 

 

Sick leave restriction is not because of your leave balance. Your leave balance should not be a factor, example they should say you use it as soon as you earn it.

Article 31, Section 6. D.

Section 6. Leave Balances

 

A.  Employees will not be denied leave usage solely because of their leave balances.

 

B.  Employees will not be denied overtime or credit hours solely because of their leave balances.

 

C.  Employees will not be adversely affected in any employment decision solely because of their leave balances.

 

D.  Employees will not be placed on sick leave restriction solely because of their leave balances.

 

 

LWOP is your right under limited situations. Know when you are ENTITLED to use LWOP.

Article 31, Section 7 E.

 

E.  Employees have a right to LWOP consistent with government wide rules and regulations:

 

* When a disabled veteran requests LWOP for medical treatment,

 

*When requested by a reservist or National Guard member for military duties in accordance with appropriate military orders.  Employees may request such leave after their military leave has been exhausted (38 USC Section 4316(d)),

 

* When requested by an employee who has suffered an incapacitating job-related injury or illness and is waiting adjudication of a claim for employee compensation by the Office of Workers’ Compensation Program, or

 

*When an employee makes a request under the Family and Medical Leave Act, or the Expansion of the Family and Medical Leave Act and meets the criteria for that program.

VOTING LEAVE REMINDERS
by  AFGE Local 1395

The AFGE/SSA National Agreement, Article 31, section 3D, authorizes the use of Administrative Leave to VOTE.

Don’t forget to exercise your rights on Election Day.

“The Employer will excuse employees for a reasonable time, when practicable to do so without seriously interfering with operations, to vote or register in any election or referendum on a civic matter in his/her community.

An employee will be excused from duty so as to permit him/her to report for work 3 hours after the polls open or to leave work 3 hours before the polls close, whichever results in the lesser amount of time off. Under unusual circumstances, an employee can be excused up to the full day.

The Employer will notify employees of this right at the beginning of each fiscal year and shall encourage employees to avail themselves of the right to register and vote.”